Rochdale responds to council leader’s threat

 

Councillor Alan Brett

Rochdale online 17th April 2018

Residents of the borough have responded to the threat made by the leader of the council, Councillor Allen Brett, to deprive an area of Rochdale of council money if Labour does not retain the seat at the forthcoming local election.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/118035/council-leader-accused-of-breaking-the-code-of-conduct-for-councillors

Milnrow and Newhey Councillor Irene Davidson said: “Well done Rochdale Online for releasing this and who ever recorded it, you deserve a medal. There are some hard-working councillors on Rochdale Council who do a lot for their wards and this town, but they go unnoticed due to things like this going on, we deserve better.”

Lawrence Glendinning said: “It’s disgusting. Isn’t this also essentially blackmail too?”

Liz Thirsk commented: “That’s him gone. At last. I have witnessed this approach to funding several times.

“Go to any township meeting and watch. If your ward is represented by a councillor not of their persuasion you are fighting a losing battle.”

“Get this ‘toxic’ lot out,” said Steve Mullington.

John Turner added: “That is a very serious misdemeanour. Firstly, Brett should be ashamed of himself. Secondly, his character puts him in the ‘wrong ‘un’ category and obviously not fit for any kind of office.”

Ian Parry noted: “I’m sure that over the years he has genuinely helped hundreds of people, but his political career is now in tatters because he was arrogant enough to believe he could do as he liked in the town… just like Farnell and Smith.”

David Clayton said: “This is very serious and perfectly illustrates the almost despotic way Labour is running our town. It undermines the whole concept of democracy.

“Well done Rochdale Online for getting hold of this and having the guts to publish. Now over to the people of Rochdale. Whichever way you vote nationally, let’s get rid of these. It is immoral and it is wrong.”

Scott Barker added: “I’d be interested to know what he said after the recording stopped about canvassing in Milnrow, I’m betting it was nothing good. Well done to the person who recorded it; you’ve done the town a service by exposing this.”

In the audio clip, understood to have been recorded at a local Labour Party meeting, Councillor Brett is explaining that £12million is to be spent on the borough’s roads and footpaths.

At the end of the two minute clip, Councillor Brett can be heard saying: “…the budget remains fixed at £12 million [inaudible]. I’ve been given an indicative list of where it’s likely to have [sic], but I’m not releasing it – because I’ll deny I’ve said this, and I’m very reluctant to say it even in this room –  if we don’t do [sic] successful in one ward, I might not spend any money in that ward. You can work that out, but I’ll deny I’ve said it; I will.

Murmurs of “Milnrow” can (just) be heard in the background from others in the room as Councillor Brett adds: “Because I’m not having, like I was canvassing yesterday, to be told in Milnrow…”

When asked to comment before knowing he had been recorded, the council leader said: “No it is not true and I do not respond to rumours.”

When asked if he wanted to change his position in light of the recording, Councillor Brett did not respond

Council leader accused of breaking the ‘Code of Conduct for Councillors’

Rochdale online 16th April 2018

Council leader Allen Brett has been accused of breaking the ‘Code of Conduct for Councillors’ after he was recorded threatening to deprive an area of Rochdale of council money if Labour does not retain the seat at the forthcoming local election.

In the audio clip, understood to have been recorded at a local Labour Party meeting, Councillor Brett is explaining that £12million is to be spent on the borough’s roads and footpaths.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/116412/pothole-campaigner-welcomes-extra-%C2%A312m-earmarked-for-repairs

At the end of the two minute clip, Councillor Brett can be heard saying: “…the budget remains fixed at £12 million [inaudible]. I’ve been given an indicative list of where it’s likely to have [sic], but I’m not releasing it – because I’ll deny I’ve said this, and I’m very reluctant to say it even in this room –  if we don’t do [sic] successful in one ward, I might not spend any money in that ward. You can work that out, but I’ll deny I’ve said it; I will.

Murmurs of “Milnrow” can (just) be heard in the background from others in the room as Councillor Brett adds: “Because I’m not having, like I was canvassing yesterday, to be told in Milnrow…”

When asked to comment before knowing he had been recorded, the council leader said: “No it is not true and I do not respond to rumours.”

When asked if he wanted to change his position in light of the recording, Councillor Brett did not respond.

Audio Clip

After listening to the clip, leader of the Liberal Democrats, and Milnrow and Newhey ward councillor, Andy Kelly said: “That’s disgusting. I am absolutely appalled. How on earth can the council leader threaten the taxpayers of Milnrow and Newhey.

“He needs to step down as council leader and resign as a councillor; that is directly against the councillors’ code of conduct that council resources are not to be used as political gain.

Richard Farnell lied to Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse

 

Date published: 12 April 2018 by Rochdale online

Richard Farnell lied when giving evidence, a damning report publishing the findings of an inquiry into historic sex abuse in Rochdale has concluded.

Published on Thursday (12 April), the findings outline the result of a two-week inquiry last October, which was opened by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) into alleged abuse which took place in Rochdale at Cambridge House Hostel and Knowl View residential school, when Cyril Smith was a governor.

The Inquiry found that the leader of Rochdale Council from 1986 to 1992, Richard Farnell, lied to the Inquiry during his evidence. They preferred the evidence of former Labour Chief Whip Peter Joinson, who supported other evidence suggesting that Mr Farnell must have known at least in general about child sexual abuse at Knowl View.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/113516/rochdale-inquiry-council-leader-richard-farnell-subjected-to-grilling-by-qc-at-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/113533/rochdale-inquiry-labour-councillor-peter-joinson-says-council-leader-richard-farnell-not-telling-the-truth-about-knowl-view

The Inquiry report states: “It defies belief that Mr Farnell was unaware of the events involving Knowl View, especially given the Middleton cases. They also rejected the notion that Mr Farnell was not alerted by the then chair of education about a further potential risk to the reputation of the council, let alone its statutory duty of care towards abused children.

“Regarding Farnell’s final statements at the hearing, the Inquiry said it was shameful that he refused to accept any personal responsibility for the young lives blighted by what happened at Knowl View whilst he was leader. Instead, he blamed senior officials in education and social services council departments.

“The Inquiry also concluded that Paul Rowen, Farnell’s successor, bore considerable responsibility for the school As with Farnell, he was prepared to blame others without acknowledging his own failures of leadership. At best, he was insufficiently inquisitive about Knowl View, despite knowing about serious problems that persisted at the school; at worst, he turned a blind eye to these problems, and chose to give them low priority.

“The inquiry received letters of support for Farnell’s account and concluded they contained no relevance evidentially and were no more than opinion. The Inquiry had no hesitation in preferring the evidence of Mr Joinson over that of Mr Farnell, the former of whom came across as mild-mannered and meek, whereas the latter came across as bullish, self-opinionated and unyielding.”

Mr Farnell, who has been suspended from the Labour Party over the damning findings, said: “Failures by Rochdale Council, the police and other agencies in protecting children from abuse should never have happened”

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/117935/former-leader-of-council-suspended-from-labour-party-over-damning-inquiry-findings.

He added: “The Inquiry covered events going back 60 years. For the period in which I was leader of Rochdale Council from 1986 to 1992, I am deeply sorry and I apologise to all those who suffered as a result of the grave mistakes made and the unacceptable failings of the Council in respect of the children being cared for at Knowl View.

“However, I am shocked at the findings of the Inquiry. I told the truth.

“There is clear evidence that I was not informed about Knowl View during my time as leader:

“The three most senior officers of the council responsible for informing and advising the Leader of the Council – the Chief Executive, the Director of Education and the Director of Social Services – all said in evidence they did not tell me about Knowl View.

“The Inquiry has examined 140,000 pages of documents relating to Knowl View. There is not one single letter, memo, report, council minute or briefing note addressed to me informing me about the events at Knowl View.

“A two-year police investigation found no evidence whatsoever that I was involved in a cover-up of events at Knowl View.

“I now need time to consider the report in full before commenting further.”

 

 

Town centre developers paid £25,000 cost of council’s South of France trip

06 April 2018 Rochdale online


The £25,000 cost of the recent trip to the South of France by Councillor Allen Brett, the Leader of Rochdale Borough Council, and Steve Rumbelow, Chief Executive, was paid for by Genr8, developers of the Rochdale Riverside shopping and leisure complex being built in the town centre.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/116992/council-leader-and-chief-executive-off-to-south-of-france

Rochdale Online asked the Council the week before the trip who was the very generous sponsor and the Council’s Head of Communications promised to “come back” with the answer, but never did.

A Freedom of Information request for the sponsor’s name submitted on 10 March was finally answered on 5 April.

Councillor Andy Kelly has voiced his serious misgivings about the council accepting the £25,000 from Genr8, he said: “For councillors and council officers to accept this level of sponsorship from Genr8 at around £25,000 is a huge error of judgement in my opinion. What happens if something goes awry with the current building contract they have? It jeopardises future projects and could rule Genr8 out of future tenders, even if they are the best value for money.”

Other councils did not consider such sponsorhsip wise, Southampton Council said it did not consider it “appropriate to accept sponsorship from developers or private companies that we are in discussions with”.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5511693/UK-council-officials-spent-thousands-pounds-Cannes-conference.html

Councillor Kelly also wants to know what the benefits of the trip were, he asked: “Ultimately, what did the trip achieve for Rochdale tax payers and the Borough’s reputation?”

Rochdale Online previously asked the Council, ‘What tangible benefits came from the council’s trip to the South of France?’ The Council CEO responded with a detailed reply, that was bereft of specifics. Asked if he would be more specific, he replied he would not be “adding to the previous statement”.

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/117271/what-tangible-benefits-came-from-councils-trip-to-the-south-of-france

Rochdale Council had not responded to approach for comment about the £25,000 sponsorship at the time of publication.

This weeks Planning Applications in Balderstone and Kirkholt (April 2nd)

First floor side extension to dwelling Open for Comment

56 Craiglands Rochdale OL16 4RD

Ref. No: 18/00321/HOUS | Received: Tue 20 Mar 2018 | Validated: Tue 27 Mar 2018 | Status: Awaiting decision


Reserved matters application (pursuant to outline approval 15/01426/OUT) for access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale relating to the erection of a new medical centre Open for Comment

Land Adjacent To The Strand, Daventry Road And Balderstone Road, Kirkholt, Rochdale

Ref. No: 18/00301/REM | Received: Wed 14 Mar 2018 | Validated: Thu 15 Mar 2018 | Status: Awaiting decision

This is simply WRONG!

Dear Editor,

It is now over a year since Rochdale councillors awarded themselves a 34% pay rise – with only the two Liberal Democrat members voting against.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/106924/shouts-of-%E2%80%98disgraceful%E2%80%99-as-councillors-vote-themselves-a-massive-34pc-increase

With local election campaigning already in full swing, it is not surprising to see that this is still a big issue for the Rochdale electorate, especially in light of another council tax rise on the way.

At the time we were promised that action will be taken to reduce the size of our council to 40 members – we the public have heard nothing since, and my understanding is that just a single meeting has been held on the subject.

With the public still outraged by this decision, I thought it was their right to know which councillors have taken this increase, in light of some of those councillors now asking for our votes in just 10 weeks’ time.

However, this administration doesn’t want you to know this information, as my freedom of information request was rejected!

I continue to seek this information on a national basis.

I will be a candidate in the coming election in the Healey Ward, and it is a fair question to ask me what I would do if elected.

There are some who are saying that the decision to increase allowances has no bearing on newly elected members, I do not agree, at a time of financial restraint – councillors and candidates must send the right message.

I accept that the role of Councillor is largely a voluntary role, and that is what I am committing too.  So here is my pledge, any allowance I accept, if elected, will be LESS than the level paid to councillors BEFORE last year’s increases.  Furthermore, I will join like minded councillors in seeking for this money to instead be invested directly into our wards.

Now, for all candidates, from all parties, standing this May – I welcome you to join me in this pledge! It’s time for Rochdale people to see exactly what our motives are. A new rate, sending a new message from a new breed of councillor.

Rochdale never forgets.

Yours,

Rob Mclean

Liberal Democrat Candidate for Healey

Antisocial behaviour still plagues local Metrolink

Date published: 27 March 2018 Rochdale online

The Rochdale Metrolink service has long been blighted by antisocial behaviour since it began servicing the town centre in 2014, with reports of such behaviour having been reported locally since 2015.

The Metrolink stop at Newbold has particularly drawn complaints about vandalism and antisocial behaviour since 2015 when then-MP Simon Danczuk and ward councillor Daalat Ali addressed residents’ concerns, and little seems to have changed since.

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/98474/residents-condemned-to-lives-of-misery-by-antisocial-behaviour-at-tram-stop

On Monday (26 March), bosses at Transport for Greater Manchester admitted they do have problems with anti-social behaviour on the Metrolink network, particularly at stops in the Oldham and Rochdale areas.

https://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/117487/tfgm-boss-says-metrolink-is- working-hard-to-try-and-combat-antisocial-behaviour-as-third-incident-comes-to-light

Local resident Vicky Butler, who was waiting to collect her husband from the Newbold tram stop at Morrisons, told Rochdale Online about the recent issues at the stop, which is located near the Morrison’s supermarket.

Vicky said: “I collect my husband from the tram stop everyday at 6.50pm and these youths are there nearly every day. There’s between 10 and 20 all the time, mostly boys. One child, who stands out as the cocky one, can’t be older than 10 or 11.

“On Thursday (22 March), I saw a lady pacing next to my car. I asked her if she was ok, and she told me she was too scared to go to the stop to catch her tram because of the big gang of youths. When is this going to stop? There is not one person there to protect people and make sure these people are ok.

“My three-year-old son likes to go and wait on the platform for his dad. I don’t want to stop him going because of mindless yobs. A few months ago, we were waiting at the stop with about 10 other people and a group of boys smashed all the glass in the shelter whilst we were stood there. They didn’t care; I confronted them and all of them put the blame on the others.

“So many people are fearful of going to the tram stop and it’s ridiculous. How grown adults can be scared of young kids is beyond me. Society has gone mad. Children used to have respect for their elders, but not now. I want to do something, like set up a neighbourhood group, but I don’t know what.

“About six months ago, I was also a victim of another crime at the stop when three young boys dressed in black with masks on threw bricks at my car whilst I was driving. I had my husband and son in the car at the time. The police did nothing; I found out who two of the children were, and one parent couldn’t apologise enough, but the other was just as bad as the child.”

In 2015, the impact of vandalism, crime and antisocial behaviour on Metrolink led to a repairs bill of nearly £73,000. In all, Metrolink are responsible for 97 kilometres of track, along with 93 tram stops, with around 41 million people using the service every year.

Speaking in 2017, Chief Constable Ian Hopkins said: “We know the majority of antisocial behaviour around the network is linked to young people. We need schools and parents to ensure their young people are aware of the potential implications if they cause criminal damage. They could cause serious injury as well as distress for passengers.

“The incidents that we have seen on the Metrolink service show the challenges that we face in policing the transport network. Since 2014 we have seen an increase in crime on the bus and Metrolink network which is why we established the Travelsafe team with Transport for Greater Manchester in April 2015.”

The Travelsafe Unit ran 11 operations in two weekends in 2016 on the Rochdale and Ashton-under-Lyne via Oldham Metrolink lines in response to complaints about antisocial behaviour, dispersing groups of youths that were causing problems at stops, seizing and disposing of alcohol from those caught underage drinking and have using body-worn cameras to identify repeat offenders and visit their homes.

Another local resident, Andrew Knight, recently posted a poll asking, “Should it be acceptable for members of the public to deal with the rising problem of youths causing mayhem at tram stops?”

Despite numerous crackdowns on antisocial behaviour over the years, antisocial behaviour stills appears to be a problem that needs addressing.

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/104241/clampdown-on-antisocial-behaviour-on-trams-and-buses

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/138/community-news/102973/back-to-school-with-antisocial-behaviour-competition

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/102276/crime-across-the-region%E2%80%99s-transport-networks-has-increased

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/101023/travelsafe-unit-to-launch-halfterm-clampdown

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/97103/plan-to-keep-buses-and-trams-safe-this-summer

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/104241/clampdown-on-antisocial-behaviour-on-trams-and-buses

TfGM and British Transport Police have been contacted for comment.

Violent armed burglar repeatedly targets Kingsway area

Date published: 29 March 2018 Rochdale online

A brazen, violent armed burglar has repeatedly targeted streets in the Kingsway area and local residents are now urging others to be extremely vigilant.

A local woman has been targeted by the burglar twice in a number of weeks after he broke into her home. She fears she may be targeted again if she is identified.

She explained: “He was in my house for 40 minutes the first time, and he heard us whilst we were calling the police.

“There’s been other residents who have been targeted who haven’t reported it to the police for various reasons. From the CCTV I’ve been shown, he’s very blasé. He’s tried shops on Woodbine Street East, and homes on Buersil Avenue, Kings Road and Percy Street.

“He seems to be an opportunist. He came back last Friday and my neighbour heard him. He came out to investigate and came face-to-face with the criminal, who didn’t seem bothered. He threatened to kill my neighbour, who got a good look at him.

“We’ve all been struggling to sleep since.”

Resident Nathan Tordoff said: “We have had problems in the Kingsway area for weeks now and no police presence at all; let’s start communicating with those that work all week and pay our taxes.”

Speaking after a police warning to be vigilant was issued in Healey, Kingsway resident Daniel Hodgkinson said: “It would be nice if the police also issued a warning to the residents of Kingsway on the huge amount of break ins and attempted break ins by the same suspect who is armed with a knife.”

The woman added: “The lack of communication within the station is staggering, let alone the failure to communicate with the front response officers during briefing before each shift. The officers attending had no idea that Kingsway is a hotspot right now, and there’s a growing number of victims. I would like to point out though that the officers dealing with the case have been exemplary; they want to see this man caught and genuinely care.

“This dangerous man is still at large and I witnessed him slash a neighbour’s coat on one of the two occasions when we were close to apprehending him.

“Many of the residents here are awake at night, scared to sleep. My girls are petrified. Our work and home lives are disrupted and we are suffering extreme tiredness. Since I have seen him, I’m scared he’ll recognise me and come back.

“The residents of Kingsway are distributing information about as many breaks or attempted breaks as possible, and the officers have mentioned it’s the same offender, after looking at the CCTV. Residents in our area haven’t even had a warning and we can’t knock on every single door.

“If I can stop this brazen criminal targeting one more person, then it’s worth it.”

Lib Dems to propose cutting councillors and their allowances at Budget Fixing Council

Date published: 27 February 2018 Rochdale online

Andy Kelly Lib Dem Leader

The Liberal Democrats on Rochdale Council will propose an amendment to the Labour budget at Wednesday’s Budget Fixing Council meeting to find a further £556,000 in savings through councillors allowances and restructuring the Council, to provide more money to improve income and pay for local services at a ward level such as fixing pot hole ridden roads, providing more youth services, and tackling crime and fly-tipping.

The Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor Andy Kelly, said: “The Labour Administration is once more being forced to make savings and raise Council Tax by a further 5.65% as a result of another cut to Rochdale Council’s grant by a miserly Conservative Government wedded to austerity.”

The Lib Dems are proposing reducing the number of councillors for 60 to 40, reversing last year’s 34-51% allowance increases, cutting paid councillor posts and reducing certain scrutiny chairs allowances.

Councillor Kelly added: “The measures include up over £88,000 to invest in increasing staffing in the revenue and benefits department, that in turn can be spent on generating income for fixing our roads and other basic services that are valued my local residents. It is also a pro-active approach for future years; planning now to be able to avoid council tax rises next year and provide the money that we need to invest.”

“With regret, we will vote to support most of the administration’s proposals, but we believe that the pain will be reduced if the Council agrees to tighten the belts of the one group of people have had to make no cuts whatsoever during this period of austerity- the councillors themselves. In fact, they are the only group of people to have their budgets increased in the past year.”

“We recognise that our savings represent only a relatively small amount compared to the many millions that this Council has been forced to save, but this modest amount would nonetheless make a real difference to local citizens.”

Councillor Irene Davidson, who will second the proposal, said “It is about time we looked at more creative ways to improve income owed to the council, and the best way to do that is pay for more staff to bring that income in. It is an ‘invest to save plan’.

“As a Council we should be seeking ways to return collection rates to where they were pre 2010. Rochdale Council has written off over £10m of debt in that time which we will never recover. There is nothing stopping us providing debt and budgeting advice to people and businesses which is proven to increase collections and reduce personal stress.”